About this site

Who the site is for

The readers are operators, platform builders, CTOs and product managers deciding where their games and betting content will come from. The content assumes some technical familiarity: wallets, callbacks and revenue share are explained, but not simplified away.

How the comparisons are written

Every vendor is described in the third person, using figures taken from its own published pages and dated when checked. Where a vendor publishes nothing on a point, the page says "not published" instead of estimating. Strengths are stated as plainly as gaps, including where large enterprise suppliers outperform smaller self-service ones on certifications, SLAs and jurisdictions.

The ranking order follows six criteria explained on the methodology page: catalogue size, published pricing, absence of setup fees, time to first live game, sportsbook and casino in one wallet, and documentation openness.

What is covered

Three families of product are compared: casino game aggregators that bundle many studios behind one API, broader casino software suites that add platforms and payments, and sportsbook APIs and platforms for operators adding betting. Each has its own guide, starting from the main ranking, the casino software overview and the sportsbook API ranking. Individual vendor reviews go deeper on scope, published terms and fit.

What the site does not do

• It does not publish star ratings, awards or testimonials.
• It does not review or promote consumer-facing casinos.
• It does not sell rankings or sponsored positions.

Keeping figures current

Aggregator catalogues and terms change often. Figures are re-checked periodically, and anyone spotting a stale figure can flag it through the contact form, citing where the vendor now publishes it.